How?
They brought attention to the abortion debate, in much the same way protestors outside an abortion clinic do.
They made people think about the abortion question on a personal level, just as those who carry posters of aborted babies do.
They made it very ‘in your face’ just as the moving billboards do.
They allowed everyone to ‘go on the record’ just protestors who argue with the pro-life crowd do.
And, if this was a hoax, they brought more attention to the abortion question than any protest, billboard, or even an arrest outside a clinic has doen for a long time.
And they did this all without even endangering the life of one baby.
So, specifically, what is it that they did that was so offensive to saving babies lives?
Umm... my apologies if I’m misunderstanding something, but doesn’t the article state, specifically, that it was a hoax? Even by virtue of your response, you’re stating “And they did this all without even endangering the life of one baby;” so then you understand that this was a hoax, right?
The problem with petty back and forth in these exchanges is that the original article/statement is forgotten. The actions of this couple, defrauding, by definition meaning “deceitful pretenses,” an entire audience of web users and even having their poll hijacked, in a sense, by leftists; the intent to even entertain the idea of aborting a child by means of a simple majority vote is disgusting and deserving of reproach.
If you mean the protesters outside of an abortion clinic; I didn’t mean to imply that I was offended by them. I even honk at them and wave in approval. God bless them for standing out on a street corner and diligently trying to save lives. Like I said, if they can change the mind of even one young woman seeking an abortion, I believe they’ve done God’s work.
Did I explain myself clearly enough there? I’m still a little fuzzy on your context, so if you need more clarification, please let me know.