Posted on 11/23/2010 5:58:30 AM PST by tutstar
“Was told” UM is using our research as an update of his “report.”
Guess we’re now ‘insiders.’ LOLOL!
But not worth the time...the post would go down the memory hole.
The sad part is it took us how many minutes to get the names & terms of the commissioners and figure out why the USCCR did its own document dump.
It ain't rocket science. Ulsterman must be dumb as a rock. BTW: Note new tagline :-)
^5
BUSTED right here on FR. UM can delete fb, but cannot erase this FR thread. Anyone googling the Ulsterman NPB “report” will be directed here ... to THE “source.”
No doubt UM didn’t know to check Yaki’s twitter, let alone who his was in the first place. Rookie.
his = he
Shortened it.
Comments Anthony G Martin (aka Ulsterman imho) had this to say regarding his (imo) alter ego:***
"...But here is the thing. The substance of what has been posted by Ulsterman and the WH insider or not dependent at all on whether or not they turn out to be legit. Here's why. The facts have been confirmed by other sources.
and again:
....As I stated in my previous message to you, which apparently you did not read, it does not matter if Ulsterman and the insider are creations of someone. The substance of their claims so far have been confirmed. And I can tell you there is MUCH more to come. Others besides anonymous sources can do investigations, you know...and there is a bombshell on the way when it all comes together in a form that can be reported.....
He is saying a journalist (as he fashions himself) can lie. The ends justify the means. This is what MSM tried with Bush regardling his National Guard Service and the LAX players.
I just want to put on record that AGM, aka welshman007, aka ulsterman, (imho based on twitter screenshots) has written in no uncertain terms, it does not matter if the articles are fabricated.
What angers me most is these low lifes (ie wannabe's thinking nothing of fabricating stories) hurt FR's credibility whenever they are cited, linked to, or used as a source..
***I have screenshots in case it goes down the memory hole.
Maggief- why do you trust Joe Baron? I don’t.
See post #38. I said it is not conclusive.
I haven’t seen any evidence that UM and his insider should be believed either, on the contrary. There seem to be a few FReepers pushing his agenda. Why? I don’t know.
Thanks, I will read #38 if I didn’t yet!
I just think that Baron smells even less trustworthy than Ulsterman; seems some are Baron-believers for some odd reason.
On the net, I won’t take anyone at their word. Through research I look for evidence to support or refute one’s claims. There is NO evidence that suggests UM and his “insider” are legit ... zip, zero, nada. He hasn’t scooped any news, and was dead wrong regarding Pelosi.
“Was told” UM’s fb has over 1,500 followers, FReepers incluced, offering plenty of opportunities and leads. Interestingly, UM seemingly pimped for ‘birther’ analogies and supporting links, then deleted the thread and comments before the release a new UM ‘birther’ report ... so “I hear.”
Though NOT CONCLUSIVE, Joe Baron offers some compelling arguments, some of which check out. There is other evidence that supports his claims, which I am not going to post. This is not about the personality, it’s about facts. Did he pose himself using an alias? Yes. Are some of his claims legit? Yes.
There are also FReepers pushing the UM hoax. I won’t elaborate, but it is not too difficult to decipher the connections. Posers? Blog pimps? Gamers? You decide.
I will divulge that ptbor and I did research on developments in the NBP voter intimidation case and USCCR Commissioner Yaki. Shortly thereafter, details were posted on UM’s fb, his source ... “was told.” “Was told” by whom, his “insider?” NOPE. It first appeared on FR, ... researched on FR. (I checked before posting.)
I also investigated a BO quote UM cited in an article he wrote pertaining to BO’s Asian trip. When the article was posted that quote showed up NOWHERE on the net, (except some random blog in NC or SC.) Why? Because, it was fiction.
The red warning flags are flying ...
JMO.
Good sleuthing, maggief!
Today’s installment about the media is, obviously,
true, but anyone could’ve written it as we know
full well what the lamestreams did.
You’re convinced that UM is really an outright
hoax then?
Thanks, STAR. ptbor deserves equal credit.
I see no hard facts that support otherwise.
I mentioned before that I found it interesting that Hannity hinted at “insiders” saying BO was ‘losing it.’ IMHO, Hannity doesn’t always play it straight, and may have been jumping on the band wagon. He doesn’t impress me.
ps. Still have an eye on it ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.