To: TigerLikesRooster
Probably a full frontal assualt is next of Baekryongdo Island, first, considering, a) it is isolated...this is how the DPRK gang up and “jump” the enemy, like M-13 gangs, when he is isloated and with little nearby support, b)could take taken after intensive bombardment, and then stormed by special North Korean landing troops. I think South Korea should stay on FULL ALERT and raise security level to the highest possible. I also believe US should consider evacking civilians from Seoul.
213 posted on
11/23/2010 4:37:06 AM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
(There is a lot "GOING DOWN" these days. But don't forget the Senate AMNESTY PUSH for next MONDAY!!!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Probably a full frontal assualt is next of Baekryongdo Island Agreed.
218 posted on
11/23/2010 4:44:36 AM PST by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: AmericanInTokyo
“I also believe US should consider evacking civilians from Seoul.”
I would imagine there is discussion on this topic among those in country. If they’re waiting for guidance from the WH they will probably be waiting a while.
222 posted on
11/23/2010 4:49:39 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
I think South Korea should stay on FULL ALERT and raise security level to the highest possible. I also believe US should consider evacking civilians from Seoul.Agreed!
251 posted on
11/23/2010 5:41:01 AM PST by
rdl6989
(January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson