There is no science behind “global warming”.
Science is and always has been a process where one compares the predictions of his theory to actual data and if there is a match, or even a hint of a match, publishes the results. All of the results, including the original data.
The notion that a select group can live in an echo chamber, sharing their data only with each other, and denying the data to all skeptics is not science. It is propaganda.
When we see all of the original data published and all of the ways in which it was manipulated explained in detail, and skeptics have the chance to analyze the data according to their own theories, then and only then will we have science.
Heh!
There’s always been Climatology and Meteorology if I remember it right!
Political Standpoint:
Since the liberals are claiming about Climate Change using scientific materials ... then Climate Science is therefore necessary.
Real Life/Pure Science:
WE REALLY NEED TO STUDY CLIMATE AND WEATHER AS PART OF OUR OVERALL DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN.
Common!
Palin’s Climate Change Sub-Office:
She said it outrightly: To prove whether “climate change” is really melting ice in North Slope. What happened: she used that office as a platform to disprove the claims of Al Gore.
IN A FORMAL DEBATE, YOU CAN’T JUST SAY “CLIMATE IS FIXED AND WILL NEVER CHANGE!”. YOU’LL LOSE THE DEBATE IMMEDIATELY.