Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

I blame the employees. All they’d have to do is refuse to grope people. If they’re fired any court would rule in their favor because they refused an order to violate a person’s 4th amendment rights. A person cannot be fired for refusing to break the law.


42 posted on 11/22/2010 4:58:43 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Terry Mross
If they’re fired any court would rule in their favor

No telling how a court will "interpret" the law these days.

48 posted on 11/22/2010 5:09:06 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross
I blame the employees. All they’d have to do is refuse to grope people. If they’re fired any court would rule in their favor because they refused an order to violate a person’s 4th amendment rights. A person cannot be fired for refusing to break the law.

They could also argue that it was not in their job description when they were hired, and that there has been no change in US law that would precipitate this change in TSA policy.

85 posted on 11/23/2010 4:37:19 AM PST by Hoodat ( Don't touch my junk, Bro !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson