[Little Pharma]

Fiscal conservatism, if employed, will naturally result in social conservatism. We can’t expect to use the gov’t to dictate sexual behavior or even reproductive decisions, but if the gov’t is no longer a tool for liberals to bludgeon us with with decadence and death then their leverage disipates. Conservatism is the natural state, liberalism keeps decadence alive with our tax dollars. If we shrink gov’t, abhorent behavior no longer has a source of support in the public arena.

[ForGod'sSake]

If we shrink gov’t, abhorent behavior no longer has a source of support in the public arena.

Conservative voters, continuing and increasing their engagement in the process is the only thing will keep the Dhimmtards from mining enough libtard votes to beat us. And don't forget the part a still formidable dinomedia has played in all of this. Even so, the country is demonstrably conservative so how is it the Dhimmtards even get close? My suspicion is that fully a fourth of libtard votes are fraudulent. Conservatives will have to continue to turn out in unprecendented numbers to offset the criminal enterprise that is the Dhimmtard party and the dinomedia. Nothing else matters.

[LomanBill]

[Fiscal conservatism, if employed, will naturally result in social conservatism.]

 

Well then, if that's the "natural" course of things - then surely you have an historical example that demonstrates the validity of your assertion?

 

I, OTOH, observe that Romans 1:25+ contradicts you; and that Paul seems to have observed that ungodly moral decay precipitates the "giving over" of society into anarchy and self-destruction, "Fiscal" and otherwise.

 

Was Paul lying?  If so, what's his motivation?

[Paradox]

Fiscal conservatism, if employed, will naturally result in social conservatism.

I agree completely. Look what the "Great Society" has done to the black, urban, family.

Oh, and welcome to FreeRepublic!