That doesn't make sense either.
The other was to point out that those two guys you mentioned are not in the running for the nomination at this time, and they have no substantial support in that direction, so it is a little hopeless to try and over sell them as equal to a serious frontrunner like Governor Palin.
In the running at this time? That's absurd. Look, I get what you're doing; I say that Pence won the Value Voters Summit straw poll (ahead of Palin) and Demint has enormous support in the TEA Party and among Conservatives (equal or better than Palin's) and you ignore it. Clearly, you don't want the most Conservative candidate in the race and would rather ignore her own words in that regard. It's interesting that you think this is a good strategy...
The point that you seem unable to understand is that the second part of your post 124 was a ridiculous comparison.
Your holding on to Pence as winning a straw vote is silly too, straw votes mean nothing or Ron Paul would be President forever. Your claim that DeMint has equal or even better support than Palin is absurd also, DeMint is popular, but not in the Presidential standings.
The weird strategy is your obsession with that throwaway statement of Palin’s, what are you going to do, sue her in court, because you claim that now she cannot run for President because you prefer one of the guys, and that your lawyer can prove that they fulfill Governor Palin’s internal vision of who can fulfill her goals for President?