--------------------------
You said it all Plenty!
Posted on 11/22/2010 5:38:22 AM PST by Kaslin
Charlie Rangel, convicted of eleven ethics violations – the most ever found against any member of Congress – was resoundingly re-elected, getting 80% of his district’s vote.
After 40 years representing these folks, you can’t conclude he was an unknown commodity. Granted, the conviction occurred after the election, but the charges were well publicized.
Has Charlie Rangel’s leadership produced life so grand in Harlem that flagrant and persistent unethical behavior by their Congressman means nothing to its residents?
The national poverty rate is around 14%. In the 15th district of New York, Charlie Rangel’s district, it’s 24.3%. The child poverty rate is 30.9%.
Whatever it is that Harlem voters find so attractive about Mr. Rangel, it’s hard to conclude that quality of life is something they feel they owe to him.
But let’s think about this in a broader context.
Charlie Rangel is a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
There are now 41 House members who belong to the Caucus. In the most recent elections, 37 of them ran as incumbents and all regained their seats handily. The four seats that were vacated were easily captured by new black Democrats.
That’s a 100% return rate. These Black Caucus Democrats recaptured their seats getting an average 75% of their district’s vote.
In a year when 62 Democrats were defeated – a 25% reduction in the bloc of 252 Democrats in the current Congress – the reduction of the bloc of 41 black Democrats was zero.
The average poverty rate in the districts of Congressional Black Caucus members is 20.3% - six points higher than the national average. The average child poverty rate in these districts is 28.8%.
So, as in Charlie Rangel’s case, it’s hard to conclude that these Black Caucus Democrats are being sent back to Washington by large voting margins, year after year, because they are delivering such fine lives to their constituents.
A problem here is that elections in Black Caucus districts are not exactly what might be described as free and open.
About three quarters of these districts are Majority Minority districts, hard wired to guarantee election of blacks. The remaining districts are also gerrymandered through various schemes flowing from collusion of political parties and state legislatures.
The initial provision of the Voting Rights Act, passed in 1965, to deal with voting problems was structured to counter schemes going on in the South – literacy tests, etc – rigged to keep blacks from registering and voting.
But by the 1970’s, this provision morphed into district gerrymandering. What was initially meant to protect the voting rights of blacks evolved into provisions to guarantee the election of blacks.
The result of this overall process is a bloc of politically manipulated districts which, coupled with other institutional biases protecting incumbents, virtually guarantees the election of black Democrats.
You might say that rigged elections might be justified if it meant better lives for black constituents.
But given that these districts are largely characterized by persistent poverty and some of the worst public schools in the country, this is a conclusion that’s hard to reach.
Earlier this year, the New York Times profiled the prodigious money raising prowess and dubious ethics of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation. The Times editorialized, “Of all the money machines shaving ethical corners, few rival the Congressional Black Caucus…..the caucus spends far more on gala entertainments and golf outings than on the scholarships that billboard its charity drives.”
Political markets are like commercial markets. The absence of competition results in shoddy products.
When we send American soldiers into harm’s way abroad to fight for free elections, perhaps we should spend more time considering the quality of our own democracy at home.
..and now Rangle's constituents are effectively without representation.
Rangle will not be assigned to any committee from now on, and especially after the R's assume the House in Jan.
Rangle will not be able ever to help any of the people who "elected" him...
...Rangle, if he had any integrety or honor would have resigned months, if not years, ago. His obstinate refusal to admit any "wrongdoing" only proves that he really don't give a rat's ass about his constituents, so now they are without representation in the House of Representatives..
You can't be a Lib/Prog and still have a sense of ethics or moral standards. It's the party/mob of "whatever I can get away with"
Check the bumper stickers of the *ssholes that run Stop signs, speed thru residential neighborhoods, park at the yellow curb to pick up their laundry, etc. It's always "f*ck you, me first"!
--------------------------
You said it all Plenty!
Exactly...and HOW can these poor voters not see this???????
They see only that Rangel and the others are black, and that is enough.
As I stated before, this makes for an opportunity for conservative activism in such communities.
Liars & thieves. All of them.
He black and he went to Selma. For this we should leaf the po man be. Beside who knows how long before he gonna die.
Why are Duke Cunningham and William Jefferson (guy with the $100,000 in his freezer ) in jail and not Charlie Rangel ?
What’s the difference ? It’s ok to raid the public treasury but private contractor kickbacks land you in the clinker ?
I want the media to explain the difference.
Or is it because, as Rush said, it’s because Rangel marched in Selma giving him a lifelong Teflon coating?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.