Lol. I've seen some here refer to it as a Cessna. Flying backwards, no doubt. But I never saw anyone refer to it as a huey.
Go look for yourself, Silver. The RN stuff is all over google. Are you that incompetent?
I 'fess up: I think I did somewhere on one of these earlier threads, thinking that "Huey" would imply that it was one of those big military helicopters. I am NO expert in identifying types of military aircraft, but I can tell the difference between a civilian or news helicopter and a big military one. The one in that clip looks a lot like one of the big military choppers that I've often seen fly overhead (often on groups of three or four) over the years.
Go look for yourself, Silver. The RN stuff is all over google. Are you that incompetent?
Ah, then it should be very easy for you, the evidencemeister, to show me, the flailer, up. You made the claim, you support it. If you won't, that will tell me something. Oh, BTW, I looked. That's why I'm challenging you, because I either missed it or you're slinging BS.
Lol. I've seen some here refer to it as a Cessna. Flying backwards, no doubt. But I never saw anyone refer to it as a huey.
Using Google you can find several instances of Freepers saying it looks like a Huey. You're not too incompetent to do that, are you? But really, you're sidestepping the main point: Your theory that the Navy was going after a sub that had launched an SLBM depends on the Navy, despite having hundreds of Seahawks and Oceanhawks that perform brilliantly, secretly putting a dipping sonar on a Chinook. Shaky as a hammock in an earthquake.
Bring evidence or go home, sparky. Jinking around the sky is not good enough.