[Nitehawk0325]

I take it you don't believe what you saw in videos. So does that make you close minded to the truth? Probably. I did research on the general. I respect the rank, not the person. Just like the loser Obama. In my opinion, the general’s qualifications and opinions are above board. I am 99% sure of a few things. One, I sure as hell don't trust politicians. Two, I believe none of what I hear and half of what I see. Three, I spent enough time in the service and have some experience of what I saw on the video. Four, as you put it in your reply, most everyone comes to conclusions without doing research. And five, I can assure you I am NOT PART OF THAT GROUP.
I suggest to you not to assume what other people know or think. Have a great day.

[Mr. Silverback]

I respect your views. I respect Jim Cash, though I believe he’s off-base here, just as McInerney was.

So let me ask you three questions, and even if you think it’s still a missile, maybe you’ll understand why I’m certain it’s a jet.

1. China’s SLBM’s are two stage, ours are three stage. Yet we have no evidence of a stage separation on the video, in Warren’s stills or in eyewitness accounts. How can that be?

2. Warren’s last photo was taken approximately five miuntes after “launch.” By this time an SLBM would be in space and hundreds of miles downrange. Yet he was able to photograph it with a $900 off-the-shelf Nikon and no long lens. How can this be? (BTW, if you haven’t seen Warren’s photos, let me know and I’ll point you to them.)

3. Why is the “bottom” portion of the object’s trail smeared so badly in the photo in post 166? Wouldn’t that require high winds, the sorts of winds that smear contrails at high altitudes every day?

[Fundamentally Fair]

I suggest to you not to assume what other people know or think.

I suggest that you not post here if you don't want to be challenged.

Now pull your panties out of your crack.