Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: piytar
But maybe they will use it as highly mobile artillery in a direct fire role.

That's what I'm thinking as well. Also as highly-mobile cover for Marine riflemen to duck behind when taking light arms fire.

Tanks have worked well in similar situations before. Recall that one of the reasons why the US got bit so hard in Somalia was because Clinton's first SecDef (McNamara "Wiz Kid" Les Aspin) refused to fulfill request to deploy armor.
36 posted on 11/21/2010 11:27:41 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter; elcid1970

“Tanks have worked well in similar situations before. Recall that one of the reasons why the US got bit so hard in Somalia was because Clinton’s first SecDef (McNamara “Wiz Kid” Les Aspin) refused to fulfill request to deploy armor.”

Excellent point. BTW, elcid made the comment you quoted, so I’m copying him. (I agree 100%, just thought he might be interested in your point, too.)


40 posted on 11/21/2010 11:37:51 AM PST by piytar (There is evil. There is no such thing as moderate evil. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson