Your answers have been fairly weak IMO.
I find it amusing that you find yourself in an argument about a topic that isn’t even the subject of the posted article. Whether Bush lied or not is not what Mark Shields was talking about.
The evidence in your favor were the actual inspections by those who were there and looked. My recollection is that in spite ‘of everyone believing the mushroom cloud was about to appear’, those on the ground who were looking did not find the mushroom cloud potential. People choose the believe what they wanted to believe and that includes leaders of both parties.
As to fakeroo. It was not a cakewalk nor were we greeted with flowers nor has oil paid for it all.
LOL, I have stated and it has been posted here in this thread all the Democrats who have been privy to and had agreed publicly that the evidence clearly showed Hussein was a threat and had to be removed. The left even petitioned Clinton in writing to attack Iraq and remove Hussein. The ignoring of every UN sanction is legend at this time and is clear evidense of his being uncooperative.
Meanwhile you have posted 2 quotes from unnamed sources claiming the evidence is not conclusive although they go on to say that doesn’t mean Iraq is not pursuing Nukes. As for the chemical’s weapons, there was NO ONE who disagreed he had and was producing them.
Actually my evidence is complete and unarguable while yours is mostly your own opinion.
Someone here said of you, “Always convinced, seldom right” and they were dead on.