That's revisionism, plain and simple. There was conflicting intelligence, some questioning whether there really was concrete evidence. However, this was countered by other intelligence and by Hussein himself, who on numerous occasions refused to say that he DID NOT have WMD., even after 17 UN resolutions. At the time of the invasion France and others thought Iraq had chemical and nuclear weapons programs . Hussein had plenty of chances to stave off invasion, even after dozens of provocative incursions into no fly zones, and so on.
So how does this compare to the phony Gulf of Tonklin resolution? The leftist revisionists have used this phony re-reading of the events leading to Iraq to help elect a neo -Communist to the Presidency.. And then we have you, stating that Bush "lied'. You are a nitwit, nitwit.
Anyway, it's delightful but fairly rare when one can get into an interesting and stimulating debate without feeling like he's being attacked by a legion of elementary-school kids on a playground.