Posted on 11/20/2010 11:34:24 PM PST by JohnKinAK
I know what you mean. I was hoping the second video was from a good ways further north or south. The only comparison is from his two vids from the same spot. That only compares two different events and is limited in its usefulness.
I’ll back you on a FReep of Beck and KCBS to get the full uncut video on the net. Maybe we can start a viral internet campaign. There are many other sites out there chewing on this story. The time may be ripe for the people to b-slap the MSM and force them to act responsibly for once. There’s a whole lot of fed up in this country on the right the left and all points in between.
I'm afraid you can probably guess my response in general:
All of the differences are explained by the plane contrail hypothesis with different angles, different times, different light from a setting sun, and/or different flightpaths. Still they all look like the same kind of object phenomenon.
That's what I see anyway...
The Youtube guy took his vids at the same time of day, same place and, one would think according to flight schedules, the same daily flight. It was established early on in these discussions that they fly those routes the same way every time.
But he's remaining silent on the North Korean mini-sub that took out the BP oil rig.......Hmmmmmmm
I’ve spent 30 aears at Kennedy Space Center and at Cape Canaveral and I’ve watched more shuttle and expendable launches that you can imagine.
The contrail in question was not a fixed wing aircraft. Contrails begin to evaporate fairly soon after generation. Additionally, the exhaust trail in question has a shape, depth, density, and opacity that is totally alien to contrails.
Ladies/Gents, that is the exhaust trail of a solid propellant rocket; not a liquid fuelled rocket or aircraft contrail - SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKET.
Now, who launched it is another question.
This contrail has flushed-out a multitude of idiots. Not surprised to learn that Glenn Beck is among them.
Beck has jumped the shark.
“It was an airplane for God sake.
I cannot believe the level of whacko-ness that this has generated”.
And you know this for sure? If anyone sounds whacky, you do, and add gullibility to your list, pal.
You forgot the third, knowledgeable freepers who saw or have seen similar contrails who claim it was probably an airplane.
I trust them more than anyone. Unless those freepers are proven to be government agents, I'll take their word for it.
Interesting times in America, nice to see most eyes are wide open and most are seeking the truth. This is healthy
NOT ONE MENTION FROM A SHIP OF ANYTHING RESEMBLING A MISSILE LAUNCH.
I’m with you. I wrote a book about the Trident submarine program in 1986, including all the details of missile launch of the D-5. That ain’t no plane.
If it was an aircraft, it was a military aircraft under afterburner - you don't see flames coming from passenger liners. If that is the case, we know who.what it was and there is still the lie because we aren't saying.
INTERESTING.
THX THX.
FWIW
BECK has reportedly consulted several military leaders . . . not buying the contrail explanation.
Hmmmmmmmm
That is a curious thing . . . hmmmmmmmm
trolls abound?
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.