Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativegramma

Thank you for further clarifications and substantiates of my reading of the U.S. Code on this matter. I am not a lawyer — nor do I play one on television — but I can read the code. It’s good to know that others are seeing my point.

And thanks, especially, for 49 U.S.C. section 40103! That, right there, would be yet another track to take. By piling on their violations of the US Code, we can substantiate our legal challenge to their illegal actions.


62 posted on 11/20/2010 9:54:58 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGreg

Exactly. Every individual TSA agent needs to be prosecuted for violating at least U.S. Code 18 2242, 2244 w/ clarifying definition 2246. At the same time the TSA itself including Pistole and Napolitano need to be prosecuted for not only promoting the violation of the above codes but for publicly violating 49 U.S.C. Section 40103.

Then a lawsuit needs to be deployed against every airport across the country that have deployed these scanners and molestation tactics. They are accomplices. They do not have to hire the TSA. So sue. And sue a LOT.

If enough of us to do this, endless lawsuits they can’t possibly pay to defend against all of them - Yes, we CAN win this! But we’re going to have to shell out some bucks and we’re going to have to be willing to fight. No more whining. Get into the trenches people!


63 posted on 11/21/2010 6:46:53 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson