To: stormer
You're joking, right? How is giving Attorney General Holder the right to shutdown any website he deems in violation of copyright protection a good idea.
Post an article from a website, Holder deems FreeRepublic to be in violation and shuts it down. No problem. /rolleyes
Giving more power over anything to Holder doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
32 posted on
11/20/2010 11:08:02 AM PST by
Sudetenland
(Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
To: Sudetenland; stormer
Now expect him/her to ask if you’ve read the bill. You know because we’re just a bunch of rubes because we are against Congress implementing another law on the premise that it’s ‘for’ something; ‘for’ protection of something; ‘for’ resolving an imaginary problem. We are to go along like good little sheeple.
44 posted on
11/20/2010 11:18:28 AM PST by
Outlaw Woman
(Lock & Load-Coming to a Neighborhood near you)
To: Sudetenland
They don’t “shutdown any website”, they seek injunctions against sites that have been foreclosed on, offer goods or services in violating intellectual property laws, or are selling counterfeit goods. Sarah Palin’s publisher just filed suit against Gawker.com - what for you may ask? Look it up.
46 posted on
11/20/2010 11:19:47 AM PST by
stormer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson