Skip to comments.
Numbers From Alaska: Miller & Murkowski (Write-In)
Vanity
| 11/20/2010
| Riley D. Driver
Posted on 11/20/2010 2:49:00 AM PST by RileyD, nwJ
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
....................Write Ins....Write Ins
District ..Initial .....Final...increase...%
40 ........2336 ........2407 .....71.....3.039%
39 ........3172 ........3243 .....71.....2.238%
38 ........3068 ........3108 .....40.....1.304%
37 ........2201 ........2282 .....81.....3.680%
36 ........1779 ........1807 .....28.....1.574%
35 ........2194 ........2220 .....26.....1.185%
34 ........2109 ........2143 .....34.....1.612%
33 ........2376 ........2409 .....33.....1.389%
32 ........4496 ........4510 .....14.....0.311%
31 ........4052 ........4073 .....21.....0.518%
30 ........3359 ........3380 .....21.....0.625%
29 ........2290 ........2318 .....28.....1.223%
28 ........3938 ........3963 .....25.....0.635%
27 ........3315 ........3347 .....32.....0.965%
26 ........3105 ........3131 .....26.....0.837%
25 ........1986 ........2002 .....16.....0.806%
24 ........2595 ........2626 .....31.....1.195%
23 ........2180 ........2211 .....31.....1.422%
22 ........2046 ........2059 .....13.....0.635%
21 ........2872 ........2894 .....22.....0.766%
20 ........1301 ........1322 .....21.....1.614%
19 ........2368 ........2398 .....30.....1.267%
18 ........ 877 ........ 890 .....13.....1.482%
17 ........2959 ........2966 ..... 7.....0.237%
16 ........3048 ........3059 .....11.....0.361%
15 ........2651 ........2655 ......4.....0.151%
14 ........2437 ........2444 ......7.....0.287%
13 ........3166 ........3192 .....26.....0.821%
12 ........1446 ........1468 .....22.....1.521%
11 ........2145 ........2164 .....19.....0.886%
10 ........1264 ........1284 .....20.....1.582%
9 ........1944 ........1970 .....26.....1.337%
8 ........2928 ........2982 .....54.....1.844%
7 ........3277 ........3317 .....40.....1.221%
6 ........2545 ........2655 ....110.....4.322%
5 ........2461 ........2538 .....77.....3.129%
4 ........2631 ........2653 .....22.....0.836%
3 ........2642 ........2687 .....45.....1.703%
2 ........2211 ........2268 .....57.....2.578%
1 ........2482 ........2522 .....40.....1.612%
........................Total...1315....increase
I find all of this really unusual.
To: RileyD, nwJ
I think absentee ballots could come in for 15 more days after 11/2. (fraud potential high)
2
posted on
11/20/2010 3:03:15 AM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: RileyD, nwJ; SeattleBruce; presently no screen name; 1010RD; Eye of Unk; ElkGroveDan; ...
This happened in Angle vs. Reid, also and we all thought it was really unusual, too. Angle didn’t stop the vote certification like Joe has to get a little better look.
Thousands more voted for Senator than did Gov or Lt. Gov on their ballots in NV’s case.
3
posted on
11/20/2010 3:04:54 AM PST
by
txhurl
(If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I think absentee military ballots were allowed to get in as late as 11/17. This would be easy to knock if one looked at how many absentee military voted in past elections.
4
posted on
11/20/2010 3:08:28 AM PST
by
txhurl
(If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
To: RileyD, nwJ
If those write in ballots didn’t have “Lisa Murkowski” on them, they should NOT count as a vote for her. Voter intent should not matter. If they wanted to vote for her, then they should have gotten the name correct. We can’t let voter intent decide an election on write ins because it completely changes our primary system. This should not be allowed. I don’t care WHO the candidate is! It will get completely out of CONTROL!!
5
posted on
11/20/2010 3:44:56 AM PST
by
Cricket24
(Proud to be a CONSERVATIVE WOMAN!!!!!!!)
To: Cricket24
Agree on the 'intent'. The same people who stretch 'intent' like a cheap rubber band, are the same who do not care if Military ballots are counted. Oh no. ..'sorry'. . .Also, these bags of votes, that show up in the back rooms, or in one's car - should be 'carefully' considered and those so irreponsible, held accountable.
6
posted on
11/20/2010 3:56:04 AM PST
by
cricket
(Osama - NOT made in the USA. . .and Obama, not made in the USA either. . .)
To: Cricket24
rats; better spelling of course is ‘irresponsible’. . .
7
posted on
11/20/2010 3:59:07 AM PST
by
cricket
(Osama - NOT made in the USA. . .and Obama, not made in the USA either. . .)
To: Cricket24
rats; better spelling of course is ‘irresponsible’. . .
8
posted on
11/20/2010 3:59:07 AM PST
by
cricket
(Osama - NOT made in the USA. . .and Obama, not made in the USA either. . .)
To: RileyD, nwJ
90,740 Joe Miller's total votes 92,715 Lisa Murkowski's total write-in uncontested votes (another 8,153 were contested)
Are these raw counts or have all 92,715 write-in ballots been counted? That is does Murkowski have 92,715 ballots with her name written correctly on them?
That's what I cannot understand.
9
posted on
11/20/2010 4:15:27 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: txhurl
I was quite surprised she did nothing; moreso, when every polls preceding the election had her ahead. And then the machine registered Reid even though they didn’t vote for him and had to repeat the process a few times to get it to register correctly. Then the blackout.
Any word from her about this?
10
posted on
11/20/2010 4:29:51 AM PST
by
presently no screen name
("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
To: RileyD, nwJ
I remember hearing something about spoiled ballots counting for the cow. This would bump the hand count over the electronic count and it is very wrong. Spoiled ballots in most states are set aside and never counted in subsequent recounts. I don’t know about AK but here in FL, you are allowed to get up to two new ballots if you make an error. If you count those spoiled ballots, you are giving some of the voters more than one vote in races where they voted the same way on both ballots.
To: RileyD, nwJ
And all the 1315 votes are for Lisa?
12
posted on
11/20/2010 4:38:18 AM PST
by
presently no screen name
("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
To: RileyD, nwJ
Grateful that Joe is laying himself down in order to shine a light on the goings on of acorn tactics in elections whether he wins or loses. He is no chump and he should not throw a good chance for giving us a close up on chicanery by conceding. It is outrageous that Lisa, who is unfit for office, loses with no grace and then wins with arrogance and taking cheap shots at Palin. Alaska must be hell on wheels contrary to the public perception that it is too cold to quarrel up there.
13
posted on
11/20/2010 4:51:36 AM PST
by
RitaOK
To: Cricket24
It will get completely out of CONTROL!!
It already is!!!!!
14
posted on
11/20/2010 5:42:01 AM PST
by
chainsaw
( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
To: Cricket24
You’re right about ‘intent’. I suppose that next could come people who say they ‘intended’ to vote but something came up and they didn’t get around to it but now they’d like to put it their vote for Murky.
15
posted on
11/20/2010 5:44:49 AM PST
by
JPG
(The GOP leadership is on probation. No second chances. Don't blow it.)
To: presently no screen name
If that is enough to put her ahead, yes.
If that isn’t enough to put her ahead,some more ballots will be “mysterly” discovered.
What you arewatching is a theft in progress. Miller is not being a “good German” and going along with it.
16
posted on
11/20/2010 5:54:01 AM PST
by
sport
To: RileyD, nwJ
Joe has only one chance of winning ad two things must happen...
1) A court orders the DOE to follow the law and only count ballots for Murkowski that are properly filled in and spelled.
2) A court rules that some ballots have received unequal treatment under the 14th amendment and that all ballots must be hand counted in the same way.
IOW dumping the 8000 some contested votes and finding roughly 2500 more votes for Miller that were not counted by the machines for some reason.
17
posted on
11/20/2010 5:56:06 AM PST
by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: ez
Joe does have Mark Levin in his corner. Probably your prescription is what we’re watching develop.
18
posted on
11/20/2010 6:01:57 AM PST
by
txhurl
(If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
To: 1010RD
I believe that is the case. Joe Miller’s count watchers were contesting any ballot that had a misspelling. I don’t see a way for Miller to win at this point.
To: RileyD, nwJ
It's becoming pretty obvious that some sort of shenanigans was afoot - probably safe to say that happens in most elections where the "dem scum" (I put Lisa the Cow into that category) detects any sort of threat by a legitimate conservative candidate.
The question for me is this - say there is solid evidence that there was fraud - what is the remedy?
20
posted on
11/20/2010 6:48:39 AM PST
by
Mygirlsmom
(The gloves are off - we can't allow anyone to force MITTENS on us!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson