Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F136 Phony Competition, LCS Good
DoD Buzz ^ | 11/19/2010 | John Reed

Posted on 11/19/2010 7:59:19 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Pentagon acquisition boss Ashton Carter today once again defended the Defense Department’s choice to forgo competition for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter engine program while delivering a speech on how the Pentagon can buy smart in a time of flat defense budgets.

“We can’t afford to buy two of everything,” said Carter during a speech at the Center for American Progress in Washington today. He added that the push to compete the GE-Rolls Royce F136 alternate JSF engine against Pratt & Whitney’s F135 will not result in “real competition.” Instead, the effort will result in two manufactures receiving “directed buys” to various JSF customers. He also reiterated the Pentagon’s claim that it will take another $2.9 billion to get the F136 ready to compete against the F135.

“You’d have to imagine that you were going to get that $2.9 billion, and savings back, by a competitive procees which as I just explained is doubtful,” said Carter. “For those reasons, {Defense Secretary Rober Gates] concluded that this was not real compitition, this was what he calls ‘Washington competition’.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dodbuzz.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; departmentofdefense; f135; f35; lcs; usaf; usnavy

1 posted on 11/19/2010 7:59:23 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I disagree - single source ALWAYS means higher cost to the buyer, period, pure, simple!

It’s not the initial buy cost, but the long term logistics and life cycle costs that count. Two source buy is ALWAYS better in the long run.
This guy is corrupt, and I want to see him and all his bribe taking buddies in jail! Why? Because I’m paying for it!


2 posted on 11/19/2010 8:17:36 PM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


3 posted on 11/19/2010 8:19:14 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

To me, it isn’t just a cost savings. It is a matter of national security. You don’t sole source something that is going to be the mainstay of three branches of the military. That’s lunacy. I wouldn’t want it if either company was the sole source. It is crazy talk to take something of this scope and single source it. Let both companies compete and let the market decide.


4 posted on 11/19/2010 8:26:06 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson