Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazminerose
I’m just suggesting that stories from the MSM should be vetted a bit before we assume they are true.

Fair enough. And, frankly, that's why I haven't posted the myriad of stories that are on blogs or in combox sections of web pages, as I don't want to spread half-truths.

But what do you suggest to do for validation? Wait until a second source has reported it? That means nothing. Look for video? Again, it means nothing.

No, nobody wants to see a TSA agent decked who is doing his or her job. OTOH, I personally have run into exactly two (since the creation of the agency) who needed decking. A significant minority...but they do exist.

77 posted on 11/19/2010 11:59:41 AM PST by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

Use witnesses. The agents don’t want to be alone with passengers & it can be avoided. You have the right to have someone with you if you opt to be screened in private.

Some of the stories I’m seeing are just hard to believe. A witness would make all the difference.

At our local airport, the local cops are always handy at the checkpoints & can be used as witnesses.

Some people are crazy & make stuff up. They’re often the loudest.

Some of what is being reported as absolute truth is in direct violation of TSA procedures, per the TSA agents I talk to. Thus, either someone at TSA is violating policy or the complainant is lying.

Having a witness handy solves a lot of problems.


78 posted on 11/19/2010 12:25:00 PM PST by jazminerose (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson