Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

I just don’t believe they could make a breast bomb so small and realistic that the only way you could tell it was a bomb is by feeling it.
They may to to conceal a bomb in the breast area, but wouldn’t it have to have wires coming out and someway to detonate it?


37 posted on 11/19/2010 9:17:35 AM PST by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: kara37
I just don’t believe they could make a breast bomb so small and realistic that the only way you could tell it was a bomb is by feeling it.

And the only way they could tell is by actually squeezing the breast, and that would be beyond intolerable for them to squeeze every single female passenger's breasts. Rememeber, the Michael Chertoff's radiation machines do not see under skin, only under clothing.

I wonder about a terrorist implanting a bomb in a woman's uterus. How can the smurfs (TSA workers) detect that? By squeezing pregant bellies? It's so absurd. I hope this issue takes down Obama and all his minions. And I'll take special joy in seeing Claire McCaskill get attacked without mercy when she's up for reelction in 2012 for calling TSA gropping "lovepats."

It's so clear that there is no machine or human that can screen every single passenger for explosives and the only solution is the Israeli system of intelligent behavior profiling.

54 posted on 11/19/2010 9:47:10 AM PST by grasshopper2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson