Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Liz
“The bill also provides safeguards allowing the domain name owner or site operator to petition the court to lift the order, and safeguards against abuse by allowing only the Justice Department to initiate an action, and by giving a federal court the final say about whether a particular site would be cut off from supportive services. “

That's supposed to make me feel better?

Take a good look at who "initiates an action."


52 posted on 11/19/2010 7:04:10 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Certainly did not defend the bill. Only commenting why it came out of committee.

Do nothing would be the best possible course of action.


76 posted on 11/19/2010 7:37:38 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: maggief; Liz; DoughtyOne

PING


118 posted on 11/19/2010 8:42:52 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson