And they want us to start carrying national I.D’s and THEN they will get control of the border.
The Wall Street Urinal once again pushing Anti-American Illegal Alien Amnesty.
With ten percent unemployment in the USA...we need ZERO Illegal Aliens....or any immigrants.
The GOP can forget my votes, forever, if they push any form of Illegal Alien Amnesty
Secure the Borders, Deport all the Illegal Aliens...anything else is Amnesty...and Treason
“Houston”, we have a problem! You’re pushing the wrong things.
I would like to see the GOP put together a “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” (talk about a great marketing term, why not use it?) package that includes:
* Completing the fence/wall
* Ending all Federally funded benefits to illegal aliens
* Curtailing appeals of deportation
* Welcoming and endorsing state laws like the AZ laws
* Making English the official language of the US
* etc etc
Didn’t ramming through unpopular legislation through against the will of the American people just cost the dims control of Congress.
GOP voting themselves out of office
True we are a nation of law, but we are over encumbered with too many laws that almost all conflict with some of itself.
The GOP needs to hire some dedicated law students and have every law since Washington compared/contrasted and itemize the redundancy and the contradictory.
THEN the GOP needs to propose the erasure of those laws.
THERE is an effective war cry against the commies ...
NO PATH-TO-CITIZENSHIP AMNESTY!
NO PATH-TO-CITIZENSHIP AMNESTY CANDIDATES!
How many freepers who SAY they oppose amnesty will vote FOR a ‘path-to-citizenship amnesty’ candidate? Quite a few I’d guess.
Let’s bring in journalists from England to produce the WSJ. It certainly would be an improvement.
The Ruling Class needs illegals to do the work they don’t want to do at a cheap price. The struggling Middle Class taxpayers are left to subsidize their cheap labor with higher costs for the education, medication and incarceration of illegals. The highest price of all is paid by those who are raped or killed by illegals all over the country, but that’s just collateral damage in the quest for cheap workers that the WSJ always advocates.
No, the best approach is to protect our culture and people.
close of the zone of mexico and problems are solved. The US needs to unmexican immediatley.
“The best approach is a gradual and targeted legalization program that serves our economic needs.”
Uh...WRONG! The best approach is to listen to the American people, secure the border (all of it, all sides), capture and physically deport ALL current illegals, prosecute the businesses that knowingly hire them, and prohibit all government services to them (including in-state tuition, etc.).
Once we’ve cleaned up the current mess, THEN we can talk about setting reasonable limits on immigration, with appropriate screening and defined assimilation processes.
It ain’t rocket science. It’s just good common sense...which is so uncommon among the political elitists we keep electing to government office.
More political scum. These 'effin bastards won't stop till the Bush/Clintion/Soros New World Order is imposed - or they leave their mortal coils.
LLS
And they wonder why this recession never seems to end......
-—And a Republican Senate, with the support of President George W. Bush, passed comprehensive reform in 2006, only to see it die in the House. . . . -—
Deny that you pompous pontificating sanctimonious selfrightousist Bush Bashers!!
The cheap labor lobby’s wasting no time in advocating self-serving policies that will have the same effect as when W spent his second term pushing them: this will divide Republicans and return the Dims to power just as it did between 2004 and 2008.
Where do these people come from?
I see the WSJ is still passing out crack every Wednesday. How about we hire illegals to write for the WSJ. They’d peck out the same nonsense but would do so for $5 an hour.
All the illegals should be kicked out.
No more problem.
Unemployment in the USA will return to normal levels.
Government deficits at all levels will be sharply reduced.
What’s not to like?