Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
First of all, the article state INCORRECTLY that Japan has a Carrier. They do not.

However, only the US and Japan have been able to build Carriers that are legitimate, deployable and useful ships.

though I hear the Indians are progressing and are able to deploy and launch/retrieve aircraft of limited range and capability.

Today, only the US has a legit carrier force...and China has DECADES of learning to do before they can have anything other than their prestigious "White Elephant".

12 posted on 11/18/2010 11:25:15 AM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
First of all, the article state INCORRECTLY that Japan has a Carrier. They do not.

Yes they do.

However, only the US and Japan have been able to build Carriers that are legitimate, deployable and useful ships.

And the English, and the French and the Italians and the Russians. And a lot of other countries have a lot of experience with deploying used carriers they got from other countries. Just because you don't consider something 'legitimate' or 'useful' does not mean it does not have strategic significance and tactical utility.
20 posted on 11/18/2010 11:35:56 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hy%C5%ABga_class_helicopter_destroyer

A helicopter carrier in all but name...


28 posted on 11/18/2010 12:02:20 PM PST by Tallguy (Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson