To: sukhoi-30mki
First of all, the article state INCORRECTLY that Japan has a Carrier. They do not.
However, only the US and Japan have been able to build Carriers that are legitimate, deployable and useful ships.
though I hear the Indians are progressing and are able to deploy and launch/retrieve aircraft of limited range and capability.
Today, only the US has a legit carrier force...and China has DECADES of learning to do before they can have anything other than their prestigious "White Elephant".
12 posted on
11/18/2010 11:25:15 AM PST by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: Mariner
First of all, the article state INCORRECTLY that Japan has a Carrier. They do not.
Yes they do.
However, only the US and Japan have been able to build Carriers that are legitimate, deployable and useful ships.
And the English, and the French and the Italians and the Russians. And a lot of other countries have a lot of experience with deploying used carriers they got from other countries. Just because you don't consider something 'legitimate' or 'useful' does not mean it does not have strategic significance and tactical utility.
20 posted on
11/18/2010 11:35:56 AM PST by
TalonDJ
To: Mariner
28 posted on
11/18/2010 12:02:20 PM PST by
Tallguy
(Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson