Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jd777; Lurker; Lazamataz; gogogodzilla
In rummaging around trying to research this issue I ran across the following article, actually a press release issued by the ACLU, in which that organization acknowledges the right of the government to make searches for flight safety. Here is the relevant paragraph from my point of view:

While we have never challenged the TSA’s basic authority to conduct safety-related searches, our concern was that TSA interpreted its limited authority to safeguard air travel as a license to conduct unlimited law enforcement searches for which TSA agents are not trained and which distracted from the agency’s critical mission of ensuring flight safety,”said Larry Schwartztol, a staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project. “By reinforcing the constitutionally mandated limits on the TSA’s search authority, the new directives enhance the TSA’s safety-related mission.

The article can be found here:

http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/tsa_fixes_search_policy_after_aclu_sues.shtml

I also found the following study to be of interest:

Airline passenger security screening: new technologies and implementation issues

http://books.google.com/books?id=I0grAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=passenger+screening+constitution&source=bl&ots=LpNfKG0fFU&sig=nHNRcNR9QxJLmh9vzUMxWMFrdZ0&hl=en&ei=8FXlTOfyJtCWOqiH6N8K&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&sqi=2&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=passenger%20screening%20constitution&f=false

In general it is a fair analysis from both sides point of view even though written by the, National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Commercial Aviation Security. It's general conclusion is that the courts have consistently upheld screening procedures at airports under several doctrines. There is simply no requirement of probable cause to conduct these searches.

Anyone interested in reviewing these materials are referred to the link.


99 posted on 11/18/2010 9:21:02 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
It's general conclusion is that the courts have consistently upheld

Would these be the same Courts that upheld the 'right' of women to have the brains of an unborn child sucked out of it's head seconds before birth? Would these be the same Courts that upheld the 'right' of a municipality to take property from one owner and give it to another in order to enhance tax revue to said municipality?

100 posted on 11/18/2010 9:27:02 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
I noticed while arguing for the new unconstitutional TSA procedures you slipped in a link to this thread about a suspicious device found on an airplane- Thanks for that update> But GUESS WHAT? - It was fake and it was made by a US firm.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1331261/German-aeroplanes-bomb-scare-revealed-security-test--knows-did-it.html

108 posted on 11/20/2010 12:42:00 PM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson