Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

It wouldn’t work, considering cable companies pay ESPN something like $4 per subscriber. They pay local broadcast channels about $1 per subscriber.

As much as I dislike the cable companies, they make most of their money on equipment rental and premium channel subscriptions.


18 posted on 11/17/2010 9:38:30 AM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MediaMole
They need a new business model.

I cut them off 10 years ago.

30 posted on 11/17/2010 9:41:17 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MediaMole

“They pay local broadcast channels about $1 per subscriber.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I still can’t believe the broadcasters managed to get paid by cable companies for what is free to anyone with an antenna. It is absurd. You pay for cable and you are paying for local channels that you could get for free with an antenna and you still have to be plagued with commercials. It is getting so even a lot of the cable channels have so much advertising that it is not worth watching. Why do I have to pay a cable fee and still have to have one third of the time taken up with advertising.


112 posted on 11/17/2010 1:35:59 PM PST by RipSawyer (Clem Hussein Kadiddlehopper would be a vast improvement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson