Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
True, in the short term. In the long run, the exploding white settler population would eventually want the land of the Indians, who were declining in number. The only way to prevent them from taking it would be by means of an absolute monarchy which would protect the Indians.

The Walking Purchase shows the Indians from Penn's era were willing to sell more land - but were shafted by Penn's heirs.

I do agree that what happened with the Indians was typical of contact with indigenous peoples in the past. Doesn't mean it should be sugarcoated, though.

59 posted on 11/17/2010 8:01:50 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

I do agree that what happened with the Indians was typical of contact with indigenous peoples in the past. Doesn’t mean it should be sugarcoated, though.

************************************

This sort of cuts to the chase.

Frontier, existential wars are inherently ugly. The image of Rousseau’s “Noble Savage” is propaganda, but so is this drool about the Custer, Crook and BIA as avenging Christian paladins and angels of light.

As another poster noted, Sitting Bull is being co-opted by the agitator in chief to agitate. As Voltaire noted, “[h]istory is nothing but a pack of tricks that we play upon the dead.”


95 posted on 11/17/2010 8:53:11 AM PST by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson