Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Actually the Indian war intensified after Sand Creek. He made the situation much worse.

He killed relatively few warriors, mostly women and children. The men were understandably pissed off by his actions.

Don’t believe me. Look up the official report by Congress, which investigated the massacre and recommended criminal prosecution for his actions.


140 posted on 11/17/2010 10:30:46 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

***Actually the Indian war intensified after Sand Creek. He made the situation much worse.****

How did it make the situation worse? Every warrior was required each year to “prove his worth” to the tribe and enhance his tribal status by killing, scalping, stealing from their “enemies or preceived enemies like settlers. So even if Chivington had not dished it out at Sand Creek as the Indians had been doing, the Indians would have still went on the warpath the next year as they always did, peace treaty or no peace treaty. It was built into their social structure.


155 posted on 11/17/2010 12:11:26 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (I visited GEN TOMMY FRANKS Military Museum in HOBART, OKLAHOMA! Well worth it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson