Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hugh Hewitt: Just say no to Nancy Reagan
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 11/15/2010 9:04:22 PM PST by roses of sharon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Jedidah

I don’t mind the adoration for Ronald Reagan, he was a great President and his ideas are timeless. Michael Reagan is best at representing his father now.

President Reagan loved Nancy, but she either doesn’t remember or the absence of being the target for many years that these left-wingers who now kind of admire her or use her conveniently, said the same thing about her and her husband that they are saying about any Conservative now.

If I am thinking about running I would politely decline for now since I have not made the committment to run. I think Hewitt is also correct, in 2008 the Democrats would not have a Fox News Debate and eventually would not debate on CNN if Lou Dobbs or any moderator that wasn’t a leftist were not suitable for them.

Conservatives should not debate on MSLSD, they aren’t interested in debates, they are interested in destroying the Republican field and promoting the RINO’s to divide the party.


21 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:39 PM PST by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
OK, I understand why we shouldn't let leftist MSM outlets control the debates. That's a no-brainer.

But can someone explain to me the problem with having the debate at the Reagan Library? I don't see how the two issues are connected, or what Hewitt is getting at with respect to Nancy Regan. It seems you could obviously have a conservative dream team panel, but still have it at the Reagan Library. What gives?

22 posted on 11/15/2010 9:35:16 PM PST by GunRunner (10 Years of Freeping...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

It’s a debate. When have they actually been allowed to debate what matters? They have become boring and predictable just like the nightly MSM news. (All left wing all the time.)


23 posted on 11/15/2010 9:37:12 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

We have Parties ... Tea Parties, no debate necessary, SH Politicians just need to do what Hillary said she wanted to do “LISTEN”

I think we just shouted pretty loud, we can Shout even louder 2012...

I’m tired of Politicians PERIOD ... they better hear us soon or they better get out of the way ... by 2014 we may be able to retire the Majority of “Career Politicians” and one of the first cuts is their RETIREMENT! (I actually have a four or five page Rant in my head, I’ll share it later)

TT


24 posted on 11/15/2010 9:41:48 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
I didn't take that from Hugh....I assumed he was just speaking about the timing and the moderators.

I could be wrong...

Maybe the Reagan Library is working with Politico and NBC to schedule the debate?

It sounds like that is what Hewitt is describing here.

25 posted on 11/15/2010 9:42:19 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

My rant is very short:

SACK DC.


26 posted on 11/15/2010 9:45:03 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
It seems you could obviously have a conservative dream team panel, but still have it at the Reagan Library.

I suspect that Nancy Reagan already rejected that idea, or Hewitt would not have openly criticized her.

27 posted on 11/15/2010 9:53:17 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death; Lazamataz

Today we have Career Politicians combined with MSM, Together they become a

“SELF LICKING ICE CREAM CONE”

(Don’t have any idea why Laz has to be pinged, just thought I would... maybe he could supply a dash of levity to such a horrible recipe of our current reality)

TT


28 posted on 11/15/2010 9:58:49 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Rush would be excellent but no to Hannity.

Don't want to get into a Hannity war, but I truly believe he is a conservative and doesn't get enough credit for the work he does (second largest audience in talk radio).
If you wanted brutal conservative honesty, Mark Levin would be the man. No liberal crap gets by him.

29 posted on 11/15/2010 10:06:12 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Don’t know if it’s possible but a single short little Bill that simply says “What applies to Us applies to You”

No Perks Bill and We Prosecute all Politician /Lobbyist relationships (Repeal... “WE ASK THEY DON’T TELL”)

TT


30 posted on 11/15/2010 10:06:36 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

“No, how about some unknown people who understand the Constitution asking hardcore questions? Why does it have to be celebrities? “

I want a FReeper debate :)


31 posted on 11/15/2010 10:16:06 PM PST by ari-freedom (Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
I think they should have a Republican debate moderated by Keith Olbermann, with Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, and Special Ed asking questions. Seriously. The cream would rise to the top and a true conservative candidate willing to speak the truth would make all of their heads explode, and we'd see a President in the making.

In return, Rush moderates the inevitable Dem debate that ensues when Obama is challenged in 2012, along with a panel including Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and/or Laura Ingraham or Ann Coulter. Maybe Greg Gutfeld. Or any combination thereof.

No ground rules.

I can dream can't I? ;)

32 posted on 11/15/2010 10:28:18 PM PST by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

TT that self licking cone is a first for me. Almost blew my Dewars out my nose.


33 posted on 11/15/2010 10:33:02 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Didn’t mean to give impression that I didn’t think Hannity isn’t a major force for our side. And he does do many good things - more than what is know, I bet.

I’m not impressed with the way he interviews liberals - it just seems he’s more concerned with wanting to be liked more than going for the juggler.;)

IMO, he’s swayed by what’s expected of him or what others may think of him. So with this, he would think he’d have to be hard for ‘show’. Again, IMO. Besides I’m not sure where his allegiance is - to the rino’s or conservatives. I haven’t listened to him in years - my schedule changed.


34 posted on 11/15/2010 10:35:38 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

In fact, let’s have Rush, Hannity, MedVed, Coulter moderate the Democratic debates.

Fair’s fair!


35 posted on 11/15/2010 10:47:43 PM PST by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

I’d take Rush or Levin, but I’d have to change the channel everytime hannity called everyone a great American and started throwing a football around.


36 posted on 11/15/2010 10:53:40 PM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
SACK DC.

We need a constitutional amendment that requires the House of Representatives and the Senate to be moved every two years. At least part of the reason the capitol was located in D.C. was because it was a swamp and it was thought that the lawmakers wouldn't want to de camp there year round. With legislators meeting part-time, it was correctly thought that this would result in less federal mischief.

Additionally, our founders wisely believed that the principle of divided gov't also included preventing the capitol city from becoming a power unto itself.

As for examples of what happened when a nation's most populous and wealthy city also became its capitol, the founder had only to look to Europe. Inevitably, locating the capitol in London or Paris or Rome led to an unhealthy concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of those who controlled the capitol. This pattern has been repeated in most countries with the notable exception of the United States.

But now we see Washington D.C. becoming a metropolis until itself with 7 of the 10 most wealthy counties in the United States all being located around Washington D.C. So I say the time has come to neuter Washington D.C. and to start rotating the capitol among the fair states of this land. Do it by lottery or do it by vote, but however it is done, do it quickly before Washington D.C. devours the nation it is supposed to serve.

37 posted on 11/15/2010 10:57:03 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
Brit and Major would be good choices, if allowed to prepare questions. Rush would do well as a walk in cameo role to ask follow up questions to answers, he has a way of cutting to the chase in a sentence or two.
38 posted on 11/15/2010 11:00:53 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Medved would not be able to hide his anti-Palin, anti-conservative bias.


39 posted on 11/15/2010 11:31:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Mitt Romney supporter, and anti-tea party figure, Eric Cantor, won this battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Yeah, something is funny, Hewitt is no rebel, he is a Mitt Romney worshiper who actually wrote a book promoting Mitt Romney to Christians.


40 posted on 11/15/2010 11:34:01 PM PST by ansel12 (Mitt Romney supporter, and anti-tea party figure, Eric Cantor, won this battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson