I agree. Repeating.
The same folk whining about airport security will be the first ones in line demanding heads to roll for lax security if another airplane is hijacked and flown into the Sears Tower.
It's funny, because I agree that creating the TSA was an unnecessary and needlessly expensive step. But I also know that enhancing-- even exaggerating-- airport screening was inevitable after 9/11. It just was, and it's naive to pretend otherwise.
I'd ask critics to answer me this: Are the muslims sick enough to pack a baby's blankets or car seat with C4? How about an old man's pants? Or an old lady's blouse? Are they sick enough to do that?
Well, are they?
A marxists police state is not “security.”
Common sense would have solved the problem, yet it has been entirely absent from any policy-level planning.
This is one more reason we need Sarah Palin as president. Not long ago, she stated in an interview that profiling is the answer to security problems.
If you don’t understand this, I will reassign your IQ at a new level 35 points lower.
Dogs, dogs, where are the dogs. There are new explosives that existing dog training has not yet used, but nothing known to man that a dog can’t be trained to identify.