Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; NYer; Lauren BaRecall; SeekAndFind; ExTexasRedhead; rmlew; All
From Rangel’s selfish point of view, his best bet may be to resign from the House. Then he could leave with his legacy intact, untarnished by any negative finding from the Ethics Committee. Plus, he would fade out of the limelight unscathed by any formal findings of wrongdoing by Congress and would almost certainly not be charged criminally. Then he could practically pick his own successor to his congressional seat.
64 posted on 11/15/2010 6:43:43 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

He might as well. At this point he’s just another piece of dirty worn out furniture.


65 posted on 11/15/2010 6:46:40 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate: Republicans freed the slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

Maybe, but it sounds optimistic. If the Demwits actually clear his ass or give him a slap on the wrist, what does it cost them, really? And this is the easy one — Maxine Waters is next, right?


79 posted on 11/16/2010 3:32:59 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson