To: SunkenCiv; NYer; Lauren BaRecall; SeekAndFind; ExTexasRedhead; rmlew; All
From Rangel’s selfish point of view, his best bet may be to resign from the House. Then he could leave with his legacy intact, untarnished by any negative finding from the Ethics Committee. Plus, he would fade out of the limelight unscathed by any formal findings of wrongdoing by Congress and would almost certainly not be charged criminally. Then he could practically pick his own successor to his congressional seat.
To: justiceseeker93
He might as well. At this point he’s just another piece of dirty worn out furniture.
65 posted on
11/15/2010 6:46:40 PM PST by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate: Republicans freed the slaves Month.)
To: justiceseeker93
Maybe, but it sounds optimistic. If the Demwits actually clear his ass or give him a slap on the wrist, what does it cost them, really? And this is the easy one — Maxine Waters is next, right?
79 posted on
11/16/2010 3:32:59 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson