Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2010 1:47:46 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

You've stalled, lied and dodged for years. If you've finally run out of ways to dance away from responsibility for your crimes it's still years late.

56 posted on 11/15/2010 4:59:36 PM PST by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; SunkenCiv; ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; ExTexasRedhead; Cicero; Clemenza; The Mayor; ...
If Rangel wants to get out of the House Ethics Committee charges, all he needs to do is resign from the House, so that the committee will no longer have jurisdiction over him.

In the meanwhile, he's merely playing games over the issue of legal representation in an attempt to garner sympathy from the public. Rangel undoubtedly knows that the procedural rules for the committee are determined by the committee itself.

The constitutional guarantee of legal representation applies to criminal defendants in criminal courts only. In other proceedings, the right to counsel may or may not be granted depending upon the specific rules of the authority presiding over the proceeding and/or the applicable law.

60 posted on 11/15/2010 5:54:00 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

That’s because the arrogant demigod is guilty, guilty and guilty.


61 posted on 11/15/2010 5:56:07 PM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I agree we should help Rangel delay until next year when the new republican majority takes office, then we can insure not only a conviction but an expulsion.

I honestly think that is why liberals won’t give their friend Rangel more time, they don’t want a Republican controlled House to decide his fate.

lol


63 posted on 11/15/2010 6:02:29 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Poor Chuckie. He’s got such a raw deal.

/sarc


67 posted on 11/15/2010 6:53:32 PM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Go to jail, Charlie. Go directly to jail. Do not pass “Go.” Do not collect $2,000,000.


70 posted on 11/15/2010 7:14:46 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

73 posted on 11/15/2010 8:02:14 PM PST by Kozak ("It's not an Election it's a Restraining Order" .....PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

My defense is that I did it.


77 posted on 11/16/2010 2:22:12 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Rangel: 'I have no real chance of fighting back'

And no need to. Absent a criminal conviction on his tax evasion charges, the worst the ethics panel will do is slap his wrist a little.

83 posted on 11/16/2010 5:41:31 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
“I see no evidence of corruption. It’s hard to answer the question of personal financial benefit. I think the short answer is probably no. Do I believe that based on the record that Congressman Rangel took steps to benefit himself based on his position in Congress? No. I believe that the congressman, quite frankly, was overzealous in many of the things he did. And sloppy in his personal finances.”- Mr Chisam, Ethics Committee Atty.

I often wondered if it were possible to bribe an attorney on the Ethics Committee. Now I just wonder how much was paid.

84 posted on 11/16/2010 6:57:01 AM PST by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Play the victim card, Charlie.


85 posted on 11/16/2010 7:03:33 AM PST by Redleg Duke (We didn't limit out, but we nailed a bunch of RATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson