[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

It's exactly like allowing the burglar to keep what he's stolen because - in the Court's opinion - how he entered the home is immaterial and whatever he "possess" (steals) his rightfully his just because he's there. Yes, it's sophistry. Plyler v. Doe was a horrible decision 47 years ago, and its effects continue to ravage the nation.

You got that right. Here is a joke in need of a punch line:

What's the difference between so called "Constitutional Law" and sophistry?

[stephenjohnbanker]

Picture 1 and picture 2 ;-)