Skip to comments.
Time Travel & Outer Space (Mon 11-15)
Coast To Coast AM
| November 15, 2010
| Unknown
Posted on 11/15/2010 11:01:41 AM PST by righttackle44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Red Badger
Spandex. Obviously. Because we can’t find a belt for it. Same as Barney Frank.
21
posted on
11/15/2010 11:38:05 AM PST
by
righttackle44
(I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
To: Cvengr
Take a deep breath...relax...in...out...in...out...there, feel better now?
22
posted on
11/15/2010 12:00:46 PM PST
by
starlifter
(Sapor Amo Pullus)
To: GraceG
Why without Marx? It’s not like he really invented the brand of socialism called communism.
23
posted on
11/15/2010 12:30:20 PM PST
by
Durus
(The distance between us has grown, and I struggle to quantify it. Windage adjustments are done.)
To: Red Badger
The universe is not “everything there is” it’s everything there is in this universe.
24
posted on
11/15/2010 12:32:22 PM PST
by
bkepley
To: Prokopton
“I get 93% chance of human extinction within 8,953 years.”
I think you forgot to carry the 1.
25
posted on
11/15/2010 12:57:07 PM PST
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Red Badger
If the Universe is everything there is, and its expanding, what is it expanding in to?.................Everything that is not.
26
posted on
11/15/2010 12:57:43 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: righttackle44
I dare you to find a Hyperspace Bypass.Patience. It's under construction.
27
posted on
11/15/2010 1:00:41 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: DManA
What is it? Majority rules?Earth rules.
28
posted on
11/15/2010 1:01:55 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: DManA
Up is relative to the fiduciary observer.
29
posted on
11/15/2010 1:06:52 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: righttackle44
The problem with time travel is that if you and the machine go ‘back’ 2000 years, the Earth wasn’t in this spot 2000 years ago.
30
posted on
11/15/2010 1:07:45 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: UCANSEE2
LOL. If you’ve got Vice President Cheney and Halliburton involved, you can probably get it done fairly quickly.
31
posted on
11/15/2010 1:11:24 PM PST
by
righttackle44
(I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
To: numberonepal
Up is relative to the fiduciary observer.What I find curious is that 'up' is actually 'down'.
The image on your retina, that gets sent to your brain, is 'upside down'. The brain 'flips' the image, so as not to confuse the owner.
Up and down is actually related to the pull of gravity (another thing we don't quite understand), and has nothing to do with any particular 'direction'.
Let's say there are 60 billion people on the planet. If they all point straight up, they are pointing in 60 billion different directions.
32
posted on
11/15/2010 1:13:57 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: DannyTN
Imagine, there will never be a time when people didnt have indoor toilets.There will always be people who don't have indoor toilets. Many don't have them right now.
33
posted on
11/15/2010 1:15:59 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: righttackle44
Well, the bypass is almost done. We are waiting on the ‘hyper-space’ wormhole drilling rigs from BP. Seems there is a delay in getting the required Volgon permits, and there is a safety-record issue.
But, hey, what could go wrong? It’s not like the Earth would be missed.
34
posted on
11/15/2010 1:22:37 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: bkepley
If the universe is, as some have explained it, like a balloon, expanding, and the galaxies and all other objects are painted on the surface of the balloon, as the balloon grows larger, the objects grow farther apart.
If this is so, then we should be able to see the Milky Way galaxy by looking in the opposite “direction”............
35
posted on
11/15/2010 1:29:38 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(The House finally fell on Nancy Pelosi..........)
To: righttackle44
I better review that Charlie Chaplin video before I tune in tonight.
36
posted on
11/15/2010 1:45:15 PM PST
by
Sawdring
To: UCANSEE2
37
posted on
11/15/2010 1:58:54 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: Red Badger
A better question. If the Big Bang Theory is true and the universe was the result, what when bang and where did it bang from? Was it from “nothing”?
Now if “nothing” preexisted the universe and it went BANG, it stands to reason that “nothing” is the greatest explosive material (or non-material) to have never existed.
How much “nothing” would we need if we wanted to make our own bang? Since we are dealing with “nothing” here, would more “nothing” be less and less “nothing” be more? How would you determine the yield/magnitude of a “nothing” bang.
We better hope and pray that terrorist never get their hands on any “nothing”.
38
posted on
11/16/2010 12:40:25 AM PST
by
NickFlooding
(Canceling out liberal votes since 1972.)
To: NickFlooding
How would you determine the yield/magnitude of a nothing bang.
By how many votes it gets............
39
posted on
11/16/2010 5:24:16 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(The House finally fell on Nancy Pelosi..........)
To: righttackle44
I don't know about you, but I intend to protest the extinction of the human race by eating more chocolate and popcorn.Check with a local Boy Scout Troop. They sell chocolate covered popcorn that is absolutely fantastic!!!
40
posted on
11/16/2010 5:27:10 AM PST
by
airborne
(Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson