You do not seem to have any legal knowledge. Petitions for Writ of Certiorari are not appeals that get granted or denied. Only 1.1% of the 2009 petitions were granted. The Supreme Court only grants cert if they like the idea that the case may result in an important precedent. My legal issues have not been phrased poorly. I call a spade a spade, and I back up everything with massive uncontroverted evidence and overwhelming case law.
My petitions for writ of mandamus ask The Supreme Court to issue a ruling (which they have to do on mandamus) as to whether judges can void the Constitution. It won’t make the Constitution go away. It is all about the absolute fact that we no longer have Constitutional rights because the names judges don’t care about the Constitution or laws. All of the federal judges in Atlanta need to be impeached and indicted.
Read some of what’s on www.LawlessAmerica.com, and perhaps you will learn a few things.
Here are the legal issues that you said were worded poorly:
1. Whether appellate courts should provide decisions that consist of more than one sentence.
2. Whether federal judges can be allowed to commit perjury, obstruction of justice, and fraud upon the courts.
3. Whether the Constitution guarantees citizens a fair trial and an impartial judge.
4. Whether the Supreme Court will exercise its supervisory powers because the lower courts have departed so far from the accepted and usual course of proceedings.
As the owner/publisher of large magazine publishing companies for 15 years, what exactly was worded poorly? The issues were failure to issue more than one word decision, massive fraud upon and by the courts, and Constitutional violations galore.
“You do not seem to have any legal knowledge. Petitions for Writ of Certiorari are not appeals that get granted or denied.”
I practiced law for 25 years. I am admitted to practice before the US Supreme court and several federal circuits, Federal District courts all over the country, and the Supreme Courts of three States. I have a number of reported appellate decisions—most of which I won. I have also had Petitions for Cert granted and denied.
I note that the issues described in the article, which you posted, were: “The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are: 1. Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges? 2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants? 3. Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?”
I’m not sure why the original issues on appeal in the article you posted are completely different from the issues on appeal you describe in the post to which this is a response. The issues I just quoted from your article are not well-framed issues. The new issues you just described in your post are somewhat better. But it does not surprise me that the supreme court denied cert on either set of issues as framed.