Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBeers

“How exactly does government do that without separating itself from the people and the rule of law? You miss the big picture...”

I support state rights. These issues should be decided on a state level.

“You support tyranny and a state religion being impose -you just do not realize it...”

Completely opposite in fact. If the federal government steps in and dictates social mandates across the board for all states, there is tyranny.

“Are you going to remain a useful idiot?”

Screw you.


680 posted on 11/18/2010 4:03:28 PM PST by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]


To: CriticalJ
I support state rights. These issues should be decided on a state level.

I would agree. I would go further and suggest always favoring governance as local as possible...

The problems remains -how exactly does this get achieved? By ignoring it and hoping it goes away. It makes sense that overreach initiated by the Federal at the Federal level be reversed. curtailed, and eliminated at the Federal level.

To all the whining RINOs I say lead, follow or get out of the way -NOTHING is off the table EVERYTHING is on the table...

684 posted on 11/18/2010 5:59:57 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson