I assume you have an example of exactly how that is supposed to work? Lay out how you see that happening please. I'd really like to know.
To start with, people with some sort of morals are going to be much more likely to work instead of suck off of welfare. They’ll actually be contributing to it.
More morals means less crime and the expenses involved with that.
If we weren’t pandering to the gays, we wouldn’t have the expense involved with dealing with the consequences of their lifestyle.
If people were more moral, they’d be picking up the slack in helping the poor privately instead of pushing off the responsibility onto the government, which is going to cost because the government has to pay for it somehow.
The most moral people tend to be very patriotic and support the military. We’d have that strong defense that we need.
The most moral party in this country is the Conservative Party and everything it stands for is what real conservatives are looking for.
Fix the moral issues first and the fiscal ones will follow as people are more responsible.
Try to fix the fiscal ones, and you’ll fail. The moral ones will not automatically follow. That’s liberalthink. That’s the justification behind welfare and every other expensive social program the government runs. Liberals blame the moral breakdown on not enough money, just give them enough and they’ll straighten out.
That’s worked out real well for us now hasn’t it?