[DesertRhino]

I agree. And from what i see, nearly nobody is pro-abourt or pro-gay agenda here. The difference is how to fight it. Some think strategically, some are tactical only. The truth is that both have a place.

I just side with the crowd that thinks radical economic reform can almost completely solve the “social issue” problems.

To me, the bitterness aimed at those of us who think constitutional fiscal conservatism is the answer, is like wanting to shoot down every Zero, and being angry at the guys wasting their time back home in Utah,,,,, as they spend each day practicing the dropping of one oddly-shaped bomb.

We are on the same side, with the same goals. Some of you would do well to remember that neither approach won the war alone. And that there is a time for both.

The TEA movement was financial,, and gave us a B-29 sitting on the runway.

[LomanBill]

[the bitterness aimed at those of us who think constitutional fiscal conservatism is the answer]

 

Nothing wrong with Fiscal Conservatism.  

 

The conflict is manufactured by activists, such as those who've written this letter -- who claim that AMERICAN Fiscal Conservatism (and Fair Commerce) can exist in a moral sewer, when it can not.

 

What they're selling is not Liberty but Fatal Liberality - beneficial to Organized Criminals who will exploit the chaos - but not so beneficial to Lawful Citizens for whom governance is instituted to SECURE THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHTS... from the thievery of Organized Criminals.