Heck, I don't much like Congress but even I don't think it is a CP organization. That was the question. Seriously, the fact that something is cited or quoted in the Conggressiional Record doesn't give have any necessary credibility as a source. Look, for example, at the junk Charles Rangel puts in there.
Again, where did these "goals" come from e.g. what actual CP document are they taken from? If it is just one man's opinion of what he thinks the CP wanted, it is pretty much worthless....unless documentation can be provided.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2626827/posts
George Soros in Bed with NAMBLA, Homosex Part One
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2626825/posts
NAMBLA-gate: Part Two NAMBLA-gate: The Strange Case of Kevin Jennings, Part Two [Article is actually posted as comment #6]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2626828/posts
NAMBLA-gate: Soros & Homosex, Part Three
The above articles need to be read carefully, the best is to click the link on each one to the Candian Free Press, the third article on FR is just an excerpt, and the others are slightly excerpted I think (I did not post the articles).
They give an incredible history of the “gay rights” moving - the original inventor of the modern “gay rights” movement was a member of the CPUSA - US Communist Part - named Harry Hay.
I think that in 1963 it was read into the record as a warning. Of course now some congresscritters really are members of a socialist organization, some "progressive" Dem organization. I forget it's name. One of my Reps, John Hall, is a member. He was defeated in the midterms. Now he can go back to touring with Orleans. :-)
The excerpt was from a book, the Naked Communist.
At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen: