[WaterBoard]

Nice try at revisionism though, twit.

No need for personal attacks. You should know the rules by now.

But, if you followed current events you would see that the first widespread mention of "Tea Party" was on February 19, 2009 by CNBC Business News editor Rick Santelli complaining about mortgage derivities. No mention of abortion or gay issues.

The Tea Party genesis was with Americans standing up the bailouts on Wall Street, the car unions, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and a series of healthcare reform bills.

No where, I repeat no where was a platform on abortion or gay issues.

You are dragging social issues into the Tea Party history where the never existed in the first place.

[LomanBill]

>>No mention of abortion or gay issues.

Yeah, no mention on CNBC of the underlying DEMORALIZATION of society that was RESPONSIBLE for the poor character required to perpetrate FRAUD on a massive scale, either.

CNBC? LOL. Riiggght. Only a libertard TWIT would rely upon CNBC to define what the Tea Party was about.

So no sale, TWIT.

[LomanBill]

[You are dragging social issues into the Tea Party history where the never existed in the first place.]

Bullshyte, and IBTZ.

What's the word in a circle with a red line drawn through it in the lower left of this photo:



Abortion?

Notice the position of the sign-holder's hand as they recite the pledge of allegiance - including the words "UNDER GOD". That man has been part of the local Tea Party assembly since the BEGINNING around here - and so have I. And WE have had in mind from the start to take our country back from moral miscreant libertards.

So go peddle purple Trojan Fatal Liberality to somebody else.


NO SALE

[little jeremiah]

The colonists didn’t have government promoted sodomy and abortion.

Plus, note the comment above - the writers of this letter are mostly “gay” activists.

You want to side with pushers of the homosexual agenda?