If the object in flight left the surface of the earth 35 miles away from the observer, and was observed for 10 minutes,
None of these assumptions are known to be true.
No accurate numbers have been ascertained at all, and so your huge “mathematical” posts are all baseless.
And by the way, before you violently and viciously attack me, I was a very advanced mathematics star university honors student up until the age of 20 when I stopped and switched to comparative linguistics ...
So far no one has been able to provide hard, scientific missile alternative to the contrail theory that does appear to match the photos; satellite or terrestrial. The radar data is public FAA data. The satellite data is public NOAA data, presumably safe from tampering. I don't believe Google has anything to gain by mis-plotting the flight path data in three dimensions. Nor will they have a reason to skew the sun position for the time of sunset on November 8.
I don't consider "the sunlight and shadows of the plume" as anything but speculation and a weak argument at best. I don't care if the rocket was coming or going. I just want to see someone provide the world with a map with a dotted line of altitude, speed and bearing of a rocket in flight that would produce the plume as seen from at least two separate locations on November 8. Why has it not been produced? Because it can't be done. No trajectory can possibly match them because it wasn't a missile.
To contradict that statement seems like a trivial assignment for a very advanced mathematics star university honors person. I'm a not very advanced, non-mathematics, non-star, non-honors university student and I managed to do it for a common contrail.