I don't mean to get all high-horse and mathematical but here's a simple illustration of what a east to west rocket launch should have looked like, both from the ground and from a telephoto lens/binocular using observer. The inset "binocular view" is what an observer should have seen approximately 2 minutes after a ballistic launch. However, also inset is the actual KCBS view of the alleged missile, ~10 minutes after "launch".
Can you provide what bearing a ballistic missile would have taken to create the plume observed in the original KCBS footage?
Actually, here's a mathematics-free challenge for you:
Find me footage of a rocket or ballistic missile launched from the surface of the earth that matches the alignment of the plume and object in any of the KBCS footage, 10 minutes after launch. Hell, to make it interesting, 3 minutes.
This, literally, is not rocket science: 
Again, the setting sun in the video tells us that the object was headed northwest. Not east to west, not west to east, but northwest.
Furthermore, I have zero reason to think that the camerman said the main "juice" in the video, which looks exactly like a whole lotta missile launches I've seen and not at all like any airplane contrails heading I've seen, let alone from airliners heading for an airport a scant 18 miles away from me, was ten minutes after launch. What he told others was that he filmed for 10 minutes.