We have news helicopters in the air every day. That flight comes through every day. Where is the video that contradicts the original video ? That is the minimum requirement to refute the rocket claim.
Distant low res web cam images wont contradict that zoomed in video. They cannot. Contrail images that look like a rocket plume taken in So Cal also cannot refute a video of a specific plume. Only a high res video of the same plane flight showing the same lighting characteristics, can.
Key on Point Mugu.
Again, you need the flight at the right time, right place, weather conditions identical, it isn’t ever going tob eexactly hte same, but it will be happening again sometime.
Maybe you have to live out here and be a pilot to realize this stuff.
But let’s go there....
You then believe a massive cover up involving dozens of agencys and thousands of people went into perfect coordination to make sure that a rocket launch in front of the most popoulace area of the west coast was hushed up?
Seriously? that is what your saying?
Do you realize how divorced from reality that is?
In post #366 I’ve asked how to reconcile the same event shown in images at post #58 when contrasted with post #303. Is that too much to ask? If #58 can be dismissed with an off-handed wave, then why not #303?
Or is it that the conclusion can NOT be mutually exclusive, but MUST be mutually inclusive, i.e, the conclusion must satisfy BOTH #58 & #303. If not the latter, but the former, then you and I can’t talk; it’s impossible to communicate when one party is irrational.