Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius
It’s obviously a reflection, even more because it’s there sometimes, and not others. A rocket motor would be constant ~and~ bigger.

Here is a video of a shuttle launch taken at very close range. The shuttle has two solid rocket motors each of which is much bigger than an ICBM motor. At about 1:30 into the video why can't we see any glow from the motors? It "would be constant" right?

NASA Last Shuttle Launch For Columbia

1,086 posted on 11/16/2010 3:43:55 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

Well, it was constant... and it receded quickly downrange... and looks absolutely nothing like that contrail. Especially the downrange part.

Sorry...


1,089 posted on 11/16/2010 3:59:01 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1086 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye; Ramius
Photos from a shuttle launch video for comparison:

30 seconds into launch, over 3 miles altitude. Note the tight exhaust trail.


40 seconds later, rocket has gone 17 miles higher - over 20 miles in altitude. Serious fire from the rockets - no doubt, no dull redish reflection appearing briefly then disappearing.


Solid booster rocket separation:


And finally, three minutes after launch, extreme zoom sees the fire end of the rockets disappearing, traveling over 2,600 miles per hour.


1,092 posted on 11/16/2010 4:11:36 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1086 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson