Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

McConnell has said banning earmarks is pointless because it would make little difference in the national spending.

Rush gave an excellent explanation of why earmarks should be banned. It’s because they can (and are) be used as a bribe. For example, one senator (can’t remember who at the moment) changed his vote on healthcare because he got an earmark.

I’m not that sold on McConnell as a conservative at the moment.


53 posted on 11/13/2010 4:30:41 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: altura

Ben Nelson of NE could have stopped the whole disastrous healthcare debacle, and said he would—and then was bribed into acquiescing. The good people of NE booed him in a pizza parlor not long after, and Nelson has been fearful ever since. I hope and pray he is a goner in 2012.

Thanks for reminding me about McConnell and earmarks. I heard Rush explain that. I would LOVE to see a Leader with more fire in the belly for conservatism than McConnell. I hope it happens. We shall see.


55 posted on 11/13/2010 4:42:06 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: altura

I think that was Nelson of Nebraska.


61 posted on 11/13/2010 6:37:33 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson