Posted on 11/12/2010 4:39:34 PM PST by Bigtigermike
Huh? You mean to tell me these predictions I have for Superbowl 47 aren’t valid?
I hate ANY story claiming Obama is doomed for 2012, or that he’ll be a one term prez. This far out it is simply idiotic to make such speculation. ANYTHING could happen in the next 2 years.
Remember this, just before Pearl Harbor it was assumed that FDR would not win another term. In 1979 it was widely assumed that Ronald Reagan could not possibly beat Jimmah Carter. Who ever heard of Bill Clinton two years before he miraculously became president?
Seriously. It is a waste of time to predict who will be the next president two long years before the election.
“Presidential candidates polling data two years out are historically meaningless!”
No $h!t Sherlock!
I was just making a point to all of these FReepers who run around ,especially PDSers who like to run Palin polling data to prove a point
Johnny Depp / Britney Spears 2012!!!!
I know. Just agreeing with you!
Yep, certain polls are being run out today to see how well “Stop Sarah Week” has done in pulling her down.
Wait a minute...I just read a post by pissant that has over 150 comments saying Sarah Palin has HIGH NEGATIVES.
Did you hear me...HIGH NEGATIVES!
From a Gallup Poll!
Now you tell me to disregard polls this far out??
Maybe you should tell pissant...
Why such a concentrated assault on Sarah Palin *this week*?
Hmmm. Could it be that SARAH PALIN’S ALAKSA debuts *this Sunday* on TLC (a family friendly cable station) and that previously held negative opinions of her instilled by the lamestream might undergo a dramatic reversal?
I'll give a more recent example, in the fall of 1998 George W. Bush was 5% ahead of Al Gore in a Gallup poll, by October 2000 he was... 5% ahead of Al Gore in the Gallup poll. Only after the knee capping DUI report the Thursday before the election did that tighten.
Gore had high negatives through out that limited his up side potential, same as Sarah Palin. It's better to be unknown than to be disliked (Carter 1974). It's not just polling, I know people, lots of them who will NEVER vote for Sarah Palin, their minds are made up. She could run the greatest campaign ever, wouldn't matter.
If she's the nominee I'll vote for her and do my best to talk others into voting for her, but she'll lose.
I expect Obama will be beatable in 2012, I want a conservative against him who can win.
Her negatives are not as high as Reagan’s were two years out.
Two years is a lifetime in politics.
Just keep an open mind. She hasn’t done anything polarizing other than be the victim of the largest media smear in history.
Her numbers are rising, and I agree she has a hill to climb, but it’s not that big. (especially for someone with her political instincts)
Just keep an open mind, and don’t be too surprised when it happens...
So ... without having read the article yet ... I’m guessing you’re pissed because Palin isn’t polling well?
That is pure and utter projecturing! Sarah could run the greatest campaign and some will never vote for her? saved liberals and those who like a women as a President.....please! If you bring out Gore, he was a wooden character that never projected well on TV compared to Bush, I reneged those focus groups.
That is pure and utter projecturing! Sarah could run the greatest campaign and some will never vote for her? saved liberals and those who like a women as a President.....please! If you bring out Gore, he was a wooden character that never projected well on TV compared to Bush, I reneged those focus groups.
Look through the threads pissant starts. He starts at least two “Palin Can’t Win” threads per day. I have repeatedly asked pissant who he would like to see as the nominee in 2012. He has yet to reply. It likely has something to do with his love of everything RINO/establishment including socialism lite.
Nope......polls don’t matter one way or the other, good or bad for Sarah. No one has yet to prove to me in modern times where polling data before anyone actually run a campaign means anything, Mitt has done very little other than fundraising and endorsments and stayed out of the spotlight and yet he is polling very high for no reason.........and I do wish that some here on FR would read these threads instead of commenting
I seem to recall that W polled very well. Certainly he’d locked up the big-name support and plenty of money, very early on.
Not "no reason." He's got good name recognition, is good looking, speaks well, and seems reasonable when he speaks. That's enough, at this point, for him to poll well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.