Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bronkburnett
Earmarks serve for both good and bad. To do away with earmarks is not the answer. To do away with "pork," McConnell is in favor of that. But earmarks are also used to allocate funds for legitimate purposes.

Sometimes, it is helpful to have the whole story and not just half.

2 posted on 11/12/2010 1:26:44 PM PST by carton253 (Ask me about The Stainless Banner - a free e-zine dedicated to the armies of the Confederacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
you make a good point.

but the harm from earmarks far outweigh the benefits ... especially how they make McConnell look.

the biggest problem of earmarks is that the process removes visibility of them. they defeat the process of vetting by our elected officials who are supposed to be representing us.

if a Congressman wants something for some special need, then why not present it to the Congress and ask for a vote? earmarks eliminate that process. they look dirty. they look like more back room deals. And they look like corruption. if McConnell does not understand this, that scares me about him. if McConnell does understand this and yet he will not ban earmarks, then his actions scare me even more. we cannot let him take down conservatives with him. a corrupt Republican congress got Obama elected. we cannot let it happen again. now let's move to a bigger item ... the corruption in Obama's administration, the lack of business sense, and the deficit that is increasing because of how he is spending money to reward his donors ... like the Fed $600 Billion.

3 posted on 11/12/2010 1:47:01 PM PST by bronkburnett (response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson