Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobbes1

“as it appears”. Not “spelled similarly”. Not “voter intent”. It says “as it appears”.

Since you’re fond of repitition,

AS IT APPEARS


26 posted on 11/11/2010 3:53:44 PM PST by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

Do they think Joe Miller will get a vote for “Joe Mueller” because, oh they must have meant Joe Miller? Of course not.

IF she had been on the regular ballot this requirement would not apply to her. But write in ballots by their very nature are quite different.


34 posted on 11/11/2010 3:59:42 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

as it appears ...’or’


35 posted on 11/11/2010 4:00:32 PM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
I doubt there's a judge in Alaska that won't rule in favor of Murkowski, regardless of legality.

To me, this entire concept of having an available list of registered “write-in” candidates is the problem. With this procedure in place, why would someone with name recognition even bother running in a primary?

At least in the case of Joe Lieberman, he did identify himself on the ballot as an Independent.

38 posted on 11/11/2010 4:03:24 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson