Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Of Course Sarah Palin's 'Unfit': She's a Republican
Townhall.com ^ | November 11, 2010 | Larry Elder

Posted on 11/11/2010 12:59:17 PM PST by Kaslin

How much of the "Sarah Palin is not ready for prime time" criticism is sincere? When the harping comes from the left, it's difficult to take it seriously. Try to follow the bouncing standards.

Barbara Walters gushed over John F. Kennedy Jr. and foresaw a political future for him. Never mind that the young man had flunked the New York bar exam -- twice.

"Dumb" former President George W. Bush, caricatured as a slacker in an Oliver Stone movie, made better grades in college than did Al Gore, his opponent in 2000. Gore dropped out of divinity school after earning five F's. Then he entered law school and dropped out. He won a Nobel Peace Prize for his anti-global warming crusade, and his documentary won an Academy Award, but Gore got a D in science at Harvard. Bush also scored higher on his verbal SAT than did Rhodes scholar and "brainy" presidential candidate Bill Bradley.

"Dumb" former President Ronald Reagan majored in economics. But the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, who ran for the presidency, got expelled from Harvard for hiring someone to take a Spanish test.

"Dumb" Republican former President Gerald Ford was ridiculed as a bumbling doofus by Chevy Chase on "Saturday Night Live." Democratic former President Lyndon Baines Johnson famously quipped that Ford, who played football for the University of Michigan, "spent too much time playing football without a helmet." But Ford graduated from Yale Law School, the same school that produced Bill and Hillary Clinton.

The worldly and literate Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who ran for president in 2004, didn't exactly kill on his military aptitude test. He got half the questions right and half the questions wrong -- dead average. He explained his poor showing by insisting, "I must have been drinking the night before."

Vice President Joe Biden's 1988 quest for the presidency evaporated when he plagiarized a speech by a British politician. When someone questioned his academic credentials at a campaign stop, the offended Biden claimed that he had a full academic scholarship at law school and graduated in the top half of his class. In fact, he had a need-based half-scholarship and graduated near the bottom -- 76th out of 85.

Biden, in his political career, has stacked up enough gaffes for a dozen politicians. Where to start? How about the time, during a 2008 campaign rally, when Biden stood at the podium and implored a local lawmaker to "stand up." The man in question was in a wheelchair. Or at a campaign rally when he said the opponent's plan would do nothing about "a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs."

More importantly, what about Biden's judgment? Shortly after he became senator in 1972, he voted to cut off funding the South Vietnamese in their war against the North Vietnamese invaders despite President Richard Nixon's promise to provide financial support and military airstrikes against a North invasion. The country's failure to make good on this promise led to hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese "boat people" and to the murder of an estimated 2 million Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge. Biden opposed the Reagan military buildup and the Strategic Defense Initiative, which even some Reagan-haters grudgingly concede hastened the demise of the Soviet Union. Biden called Reagan's pursuit of SDI "one of the most reckless and irresponsible acts in the history of modern statecraft."

Biden opposed the first Gulf war, the "good" one. He voted for the Iraq War and co-authored a Washington Post op-ed piece in which he warned that our involvement would take a decade and urged the nation to show patience. When the war went south, along with public opinion, Biden suggested breaking Iraq into three parts. Then Biden reversed his support, said he regretted his vote, and opposed Bush's successful "surge."

Former CBS reporter Dan Rather tried to prove -- based on documents that turned out to be fraudulent -- that Bush received preferential treatment in getting into the Texas Air National Guard. Former President Bill Clinton, on the other hand, used familial political and social connections to deliberately delay issuance of his draft notice until after he began his first year at Oxford. Ordered to report for induction the next summer, Clinton again used connections -- including the approval of Arkansas Selective Service director Willard Hawkins -- to join the University of Arkansas ROTC while he attended law school, getting him a reservist deferment and nullifying his draft notice. But Clinton then returned to Oxford, not Arkansas. When the draft lottery placed him at the back of a very long line, Clinton wrote an explanatory letter telling Hawkins that he "loathed" the military. With the Vietnam War winding down and other draft requirement changes making it extremely unlikely that he would be called up, Clinton symbolically asked his draft board to drop his deferment and reclassify him "1-A."

Palin, if she decides to run, faces a grueling series of challenges -- just like the other candidates. Except she'll not benefit from the selective standard that liberals apply when evaluating "their own."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: RexBeach

Clinton and Carter are, I believe, quite intelligent.

Jerks, but intelligent jerks.


21 posted on 11/11/2010 2:35:26 PM PST by Sherman Logan (You shall know the truth, and it shall piss you off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
And don’t even start on the anti-Palin conservatives!

There aren't any anti-Palin conservatives. There are conservatives who think someone else would be better, but if they are simply down on Palin, they're lying about being "conservative".

22 posted on 11/11/2010 2:38:32 PM PST by 3niner (When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; MeekOneGOP; ...

Ping

to Article for interesting Factoids about

JFK, Jr.
LBJ (Vietnam was his war)
RR
GWB
President Gerald Ford
Al Bore, er, Gore
William Jefferson Clinton (not enough space to list his dastardly deeds)
John Kerry, married Tereza for her money, Democrat (didcha know he served in Vietnam)
The finally deceased Teddy the swimmer, Kennedy (expelled from Harvard for cheating, opened the door for all the illegals in this country)
VP Biden (the plagiarizer, among other things.)


23 posted on 11/11/2010 3:25:25 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Palin, if she decides to run, faces a grueling series of challenges -- just like the other candidates. Except she'll not benefit from the selective standard that liberals apply when evaluating "their own."

Sarah's been subjected to pure nastiness. It's unprecedented. I would like to vote for her in the Acorn tradition.

24 posted on 11/11/2010 3:44:02 PM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
a big plus drawing more attention to her and when people see, hear or read her responses she will win more hearts and minds.

It's like a wave building off-shore where it keeps getting bigger and bigger. People will notice her public appearances and the crowds that she draws.

The left fears her (you can tell by the bravado they exhibit when they taunt: "I hope they run Sarah", etc.). Nothing spells fear better than the 'dare' offered by one's opponent.

Remember, the media picked our last candidate and, how did that work out? John thought they loved him.

I want whoever the media and the Left hate and deride- that would be Sarah. I know her to be something this country has needed for a long time- she loves America and all it stands for and has more executive ablility than many previous presidents combined. I'd like to make a couple of bumberstickers:

"I love Sarah Palin because you hate her- that was simple."
"Sarah has never spent twenty months destroying anything, not even health care."
"Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but Sarah will crush Obama".
"Your only chance against Sarah is Hillary. Fat chance."

25 posted on 11/11/2010 10:11:08 PM PST by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The polls indicate she’d lose to Obama in a landslide?

Please provide links or at least cite.


26 posted on 11/11/2010 10:20:10 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
The polls indicate she’d lose to Obama in a landslide?

At this stage in 1978, the polls indicated Carter would defeat Reagan in a landslide.

And, if she'd be so easy to beat, why are the Democrats and the MSM scared spitless of her?

27 posted on 11/11/2010 10:28:45 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I haven’t seen a poll indicating Obama would beat Palin in a landslide. I’d like to see proof. I suspect there isn’t one. This is just another establishment/lefty tactic to scare conservatives into selecting a RINO.


28 posted on 11/11/2010 10:33:48 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

http://politics.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/11/04/poll-obama-would-beat-palin-in-2012.html

President Obama would handily beat Sarah Palin in the next presidential election, despite strong anti-incumbent feelings and the Democrats losing the House to the GOP this week, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll indicates.

And while Obama would win against the Tea Party favorite, 52% to 44% among registered voters...


29 posted on 11/11/2010 10:35:53 PM PST by ari-freedom (Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The polls said Reagan could not win!


30 posted on 11/11/2010 11:50:59 PM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: okie01
And, if she'd be so easy to beat, why are the Democrats and the MSM scared spitless of her?

Yes and, the Democrats are more afraid of Sarah Palin then they every was of Reagan!

WHY? Because they will lose the women vote for ever!

31 posted on 11/11/2010 11:57:55 PM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

5 am news, Boston’s WBZ, CBS outlet: co-anchors sneering at Sarah’s new reality show (with and without makeup), and new book, that she’s avoiding the blue states on her book tour — San Fran., L.A., New England, New York,(where the beautiful people live), prepping to be Presidential? Loud laughter. Then the deer in the headlight look and: “But what if she got elected? She appeals to a certain segment of the voters...(bottom dwellers, you know who you are!)” I paraphrase, but expect Gov. Palin’s image to take another thumping from the MSM. They’re terrified of her.


32 posted on 11/12/2010 3:51:09 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

CNN poll, that is all you need to know


33 posted on 11/12/2010 4:55:12 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hershey

I’ve set my DVR to record the series


34 posted on 11/12/2010 4:56:47 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Well, I’ve had lunch with Carter, and he’s a meathead.

Clinton? Smart? Maybe? But how smart could he to get sexual favors from a kid his daughter’s age? Then lie about and get impeached?


35 posted on 11/12/2010 11:36:33 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

I get your point, but you are confusing intelligence and wisdom.

Highly intelligent people do remarkably stupid things all the time. Oddly enough, women, alcohol and drugs often play a part in these poor choices.

In fact, a highly intelligent guy, being more effective at just about anything he chooses to do, can do stupid things more effectively, getting himself into more hot water faster than a dumb guy.

Just my observation.


36 posted on 11/12/2010 2:32:14 PM PST by Sherman Logan (You shall know the truth, and it shall piss you off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson