Seems like it.
Does no good to explain how it all works.
Here's what I can't figure out. In the Ohio Governor's race, they gave Ted Strickland an "A+" rating, though his current Lt. Governor sat on the board of Handgun Control, Inc., and his running mate was an admitted anti-gunner. The candidate they worked to defeat, Republican John Kasich, earned a "B" rating, and had a running mate that is openly pro-gun. Yet, the NRA actually spent a large sum of money working to defeat John Kasich. How does that make any sense?