Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand
Are ya shure? How do you know? Have you conclusively ruled out a common, average, run-of-the-mill, garden variety methane hydrate ejecta-bolide?

Why do you insist on jumping to the conclusion of such technical, far-fetched, complicated explanation rather than simple ordinary natural phenomena? As a student of the Sherlock Holmes school of Occam's Razor, I prefer the MHEB theory. You know what his attitude on criminolgoy is: once you've ruled out the most complicated conclusions in decending order, the simplest explanation, however likely it may be, MUST be the truth.

40 posted on 11/11/2010 12:44:02 PM PST by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: raygun

Can’t argue with the methodology, just the conclusion. MHEB never travels in a straight line.


45 posted on 11/11/2010 12:48:51 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson